[cache-strategy] Cache Strategy Analysis - 2026-08-11

[github-actions[bot]]

Cache Strategy Analysis Report

Date: 2026-08-11
Runs Analyzed: 2
Workflows with cache-memory: 2

---

Executive Summary

Only one cache-memory workflow showed an actionable problem today. Linter Miner failed after doing expensive mining work, and its cache strategy only persists the proposed-linters state at the end of the run, so the partial work is not checkpointed if the workflow dies early.

PR Code Quality Reviewer was present in the sample but did not show a meaningful cache read or miss signal in the run artifacts, so there was nothing cache-strategy-worthy to report there.

---

Findings

Severity	Workflow	Miss Streak	Miss Rate (14d)	Root Cause	Issue
🟡	Linter Miner	1 day	100%	Cache state is written only after the expensive mining/implementation flow finishes, so failures discard all partial progress.	n/a

🟡 Medium Priority

Severity	Workflow	Miss Streak	Miss Rate (14d)	Root Cause	Issue
🟡	Linter Miner	1 day	100%	Cache state is written only after the expensive mining/implementation flow finishes, so failures discard all partial progress.	n/a

---

Healthy Workflows

No workflow in today's cache-memory sample showed a clear, repeatable cache-hit pattern strong enough to call it healthy yet.

---

Issues Created Today

• [cache-strategy] Fix cache miss in Linter Miner (created via safe outputs)

💾 Cache Memory Summary

• Total workflows tracked: 2
• Runs recorded (last 30d): 2
• Cache memory location: /tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/cache-strategy/
• Next pruning date: 2026-09-10

---

Report generated by the Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer

Generated by 📊 Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer · gpt54mini · 43 AIC · ⌖ 1.45 AIC · ⊞ 12.2K · ◷

• expires on Aug 12, 2026, 10:58 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #52341.