Skip to content

Investigate possible improvements to the implementations of manifest fields #1803

Description

@git-hyagi

This is a follow-up of review comments:
#1782 (comment)
#1782 (comment)

We could investigate the feasibility of the suggested improvements:

  • merge the os/arch/size/metadata manifest methods to prevent incorrect updates of these fields
  • verify if a dataclass together with asdict would be helpful for the manifest fields defined from platform

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions