Update references for RFC 3548 to RFC 4648

[paulehoffman]

BPO	33147
Nosy	@terryjreedy, @ejodlowska
PRs	bpo-36700: Updated obsolete references for RFC 3548 to RFC 4648 #2336

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2018-03-26.16:45:21.043>
labels = ['3.8', 'docs']
title = 'Update references for RFC 3548 to RFC 4648'
updated_at = <Date 2018-03-30.20:47:47.294>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/paulehoffman'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2018-03-30.20:47:47.294>
actor = 'terry.reedy'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2018-03-26.16:45:21.043>
creator = 'paulehoffman'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 33147
keywords = []
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['314462', '314465', '314715']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['terry.reedy', 'docs@python', 'Ewa.Jodlowska', 'paulehoffman']
pr_nums = ['2336']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'patch review'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue33147'
versions = ['Python 3.8']

Linked PRs

• gh-77328: Update base64 module docstring to reference RFC 4648 #151275

[paulehoffman]

serhiy-storchaka asked me to open an issue about whether Python implements RFC 4648. As far as I can tell it does, correctly, for the parts of RFC 4648 covered in the doc. My PR was about simply updating a reference to an RFC that was made obsolete.

[paulehoffman]

I signed the contributor agreement form on 2017-06-23

[terryjreedy]

Ewa handles recording of CAs.

[StanFromIreland]

This was fixed in e43b9bb under #80881.