Could support for "socks5h" type proxies be added?

[CLannadZSY]

socks5h proxies advantages:

1. DNS is not resolved locally
2. Reduces DNS leaks
3. Suitable for cross-region access
4. Can avoid local DNS pollution
5. Better suited for crawlers, anti-bot scenarios, and overseas proxy usage

[mdmintz]

Hello. SOCKS5h proxy support has been added in 4.50.4 - https://github.com/seleniumbase/SeleniumBase/releases/tag/v4.50.4
(That's without auth)

---

For the authenticated version, follow the instructions in #4340 (comment):

Since SOCKS5 with authentication isn't directly supported by Chrome, you can spin up a local proxy server with auth and then connect to it without auth. Instructions for that:

Open two windows.
In one window, run sbase proxy --plugins proxy.plugin.ProxyPoolPlugin --proxy-pool=USER:PASS@IP:PORT --log-level=WARNING with your proxy settings.
In the other window, run your script, which should have proxy="127.0.0.1:8899".
Then you no longer need to do auth through your web browser, and that should avoid issues with SOCKS5 proxies.