Skip to content

Refactor IP allowance checks in request processing#406

Merged
tudor-timcu merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/comments
Mar 24, 2026
Merged

Refactor IP allowance checks in request processing#406
tudor-timcu merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/comments

Conversation

@tudor-timcu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tudor-timcu tudor-timcu commented Mar 23, 2026

Summary by Aikido

Security Issues: 0 🔍 Quality Issues: 1 Resolved Issues: 0

🔧 Refactors

  • Refactored endpoint IP allowance checks and improved blocked logging
  • Removed unused utils import from request context module

More info

… to improve clarity and logic for endpoint IP access control, including enhanced logging for blocked requests.
}

func IsEndpointIpAllowed(instance *instance.RequestProcessorInstance) bool {
func GetEndpointIpAllowed(instance *instance.RequestProcessorInstance) int {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GetEndpointIpAllowed suggests a boolean result but returns an int status. Rename to indicate it returns a status (e.g., GetEndpointIpAllowedStatus) or change it to return a boolean for clarity.

Details

✨ AI Reasoning
​A function was added/renamed whose identifier implies a boolean "allowed" check but its actual return type is an int status code. This mismatch can confuse callers and future maintainers about expected semantics; a clear name should indicate that it returns a status value instead of a boolean, or the function should return a boolean. The change affects cross-function usage and alters the contract of endpoint-IP checks.

🔧 How do I fix it?
Use descriptive names for variables (except standard loop counters i, j, k and math variables x, y).

Reply @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info

@tudor-timcu tudor-timcu merged commit 501e386 into main Mar 24, 2026
239 of 242 checks passed
@tudor-timcu tudor-timcu deleted the fix/comments branch March 24, 2026 08:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants