Skip to content

Conversation

@mkmkme
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkmkme mkmkme commented Jan 16, 2026

Google cloud storage support for data lakes catalogs (fixes #1199)

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Google cloud storage support for data lakes (ClickHouse#93866 by @scanhex12)

CI/CD Options

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • All Regression
  • Disable CI Cache

Regression jobs to run:

  • Fast suites (mostly <1h)
  • Aggregate Functions (2h)
  • Alter (1.5h)
  • Benchmark (30m)
  • ClickHouse Keeper (1h)
  • Iceberg (2h)
  • LDAP (1h)
  • Parquet (1.5h)
  • RBAC (1.5h)
  • SSL Server (1h)
  • S3 (2h)
  • Tiered Storage (2h)

Google cloud storage support for data lakes catalogs
if (capitalize_first_letter(storage_type_str) == "S3a")
else if (capitalize_first_letter(storage_type_str) == "S3a" || storage_type_str == "oss" || storage_type_str == "gs")
{
fiu_do_on(DB::FailPoints::database_iceberg_gcs,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This particular bit I don't really like. It's there only for the sake of the integration test. But I've left it intact to be more aligned with the upstream.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better & easier to keep it consistent 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

Workflow [PR], commit [155a932]

Copy link
Collaborator

@arthurpassos arthurpassos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants