You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This sounds like a really good direction for CCSync, and it’s nice to see it reaching a point where Taskwarrior sync is both stable and easy to deploy. That already solves a big part of the problem and gives a solid base to build on.
From here, it might help to think of CCSync less as “Taskwarrior sync” and more as a small platform that can connect multiple task and planning tools together.
For adding new services, one idea would be to first agree on a simple internal model for tasks and events. If everything (Taskwarrior, Google Tasks, Notion, etc.) can be mapped to that model, then each new integration becomes easier and more predictable. It also helps avoid rewriting sync logic every time a new service is added.
Google Tasks feels like the most natural next step. Since Google Cloud authentication is already set up, a lot of the hard work is done. The API is fairly straightforward, and the concepts match Taskwarrior quite well. It might be worth starting with a basic one-way sync just to get things working end to end, and then later expanding it to two-way sync once things feel stable.
Google Calendar could add a lot of value too, but it’s probably best to keep the scope small at first. Calendar events behave differently from tasks, so maybe starting with something simple like showing task due dates as calendar events, or a read-only import of calendar data, would be a good way to test the waters without adding too much complexity.
Notion and Jira both make sense, but they’re a bit heavier. Notion is very flexible, which is powerful but also tricky because everyone structures their databases differently. A reasonable starting point might be to support a clearly documented “recommended” task database layout and only support that initially. Jira, on the other hand, is very workflow-heavy, so a read-only sync of assigned issues could be a good first step instead of trying to mirror full Jira behavior.
The mind-map style view is a really interesting idea and could become a standout feature. Maybe this could start as a simple visual representation of existing task dependencies or parent-child relationships. Even a basic, read-only graph view would already be useful and could evolve over time.
In terms of how to actually start working on all this, keeping things small and incremental will probably help the most. Picking one integration (like Google Tasks), defining the basic interfaces it needs, and learning from that experience should make it much clearer how to approach the others. From there, it would be easy to break things down into smaller sub-issues for upcoming terms.
Activity
its-me-abhishek commentedon Nov 1, 2025
For Jira, I believe bugwarrior might be useful, or the jira-cli tool. Though they would provide a one way sync
Siddhartha-singh01 commentedon Dec 15, 2025
This sounds like a really good direction for CCSync, and it’s nice to see it reaching a point where Taskwarrior sync is both stable and easy to deploy. That already solves a big part of the problem and gives a solid base to build on.
From here, it might help to think of CCSync less as “Taskwarrior sync” and more as a small platform that can connect multiple task and planning tools together.
For adding new services, one idea would be to first agree on a simple internal model for tasks and events. If everything (Taskwarrior, Google Tasks, Notion, etc.) can be mapped to that model, then each new integration becomes easier and more predictable. It also helps avoid rewriting sync logic every time a new service is added.
Google Tasks feels like the most natural next step. Since Google Cloud authentication is already set up, a lot of the hard work is done. The API is fairly straightforward, and the concepts match Taskwarrior quite well. It might be worth starting with a basic one-way sync just to get things working end to end, and then later expanding it to two-way sync once things feel stable.
Google Calendar could add a lot of value too, but it’s probably best to keep the scope small at first. Calendar events behave differently from tasks, so maybe starting with something simple like showing task due dates as calendar events, or a read-only import of calendar data, would be a good way to test the waters without adding too much complexity.
Notion and Jira both make sense, but they’re a bit heavier. Notion is very flexible, which is powerful but also tricky because everyone structures their databases differently. A reasonable starting point might be to support a clearly documented “recommended” task database layout and only support that initially. Jira, on the other hand, is very workflow-heavy, so a read-only sync of assigned issues could be a good first step instead of trying to mirror full Jira behavior.
The mind-map style view is a really interesting idea and could become a standout feature. Maybe this could start as a simple visual representation of existing task dependencies or parent-child relationships. Even a basic, read-only graph view would already be useful and could evolve over time.
In terms of how to actually start working on all this, keeping things small and incremental will probably help the most. Picking one integration (like Google Tasks), defining the basic interfaces it needs, and learning from that experience should make it much clearer how to approach the others. From there, it would be easy to break things down into smaller sub-issues for upcoming terms.
@its-me-abhishek if you say i can work on these features