References audit: 48 pages - #2624
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Audits the '## References' of these pages: merges duplicated reference sections into one, numbers every entry, adds the linked <sup>[[N]](#references)</sup> citations to the content each reference is the source of, drops unused references and credits the original research. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
merge |
Resolve reference-audit conflicts: keep the deeper audit where bodies are identical, keep master where it carries newer content. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sources the prose draws on (writeups, advisories, research posts) now have a numbered References entry and the line that uses them cites it. Tool, download and product links are left inline.
Each superscript points at the existing line the reference documents.
Both sides renumbered the References blocks of 8 shared pages. Only the IPP page conflicted textually; the other 7 auto-merged into citations that pointed at the wrong source (e.g. winrm's [2]/[3] meant different pages on each side). Resolved by taking master's version of all 8, then re-adding, without renumbering, the sources master lacked and re-anchoring their citations to the same sentences the PR used: pentesting-631-ipp [5] Lexmark CVE-2023-50739 advisory, [6] ZDI-23-556 5985-5986-omi [3] horizon3ai CVE-2021-38647 PoC 5985-5986-winrm [4] ServerFault non-domain WinRM, [5] alamot winrm_shell 8086-influxdb [4] LorenzoTullini CVE-2019-20933 PoC, [5] InfluxDB docs pentesting-ftp [6] thesecuritybuddy - FTP bounce attack Also kept the PR's concrete fixed-version pin (cups-filters >= 2.0.0), which master stated only generically. Verified: 0 numbering clashes against master, 0 dangling citations. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
merge |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference/citation audit for 48 pages.
## Referencessection per page, at the end- [N] [Title](url)<sup>[[N]](#references)</sup>citations on the content each reference sources🤖 Generated with Claude Code