Skip to content

Sync OpenAPI spec: 3641461 - #66

Closed
zeyu2001 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
openapi/3641461
Closed

Sync OpenAPI spec: 3641461#66
zeyu2001 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
openapi/3641461

Conversation

@zeyu2001

@zeyu2001 zeyu2001 commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Regenerated openapi.json from the public REST spec that just shipped to prod.

  • Source commit: 3641461

The API reference pages resolve their operations from this spec, so this keeps the published reference in sync with the live API.


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only spec sync in this repo; the main reviewer note is that API clients reading the reference should no longer expect Azure in /repos responses.

Overview
Regenerates openapi.json so published API reference matches the live REST API (source commit 3641461). Most of the diff is JSON formatting (multi-line tags, enum, and required arrays); operation paths and request/response shapes are otherwise unchanged.

The meaningful contract update is in UnifiedRepoDto: azure is removed from the provider enum, and field descriptions for name, providerKey, and baseUrl no longer mention Azure DevOps—repos are documented as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket only, with baseUrl scoped to GitHub Enterprise.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit e6f5e7c. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-05T09:00:08.072979Z e6f5e7c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@zeyu2001

zeyu2001 commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closed after a successful DOCS_PR_TOKEN write-path test. This PR intentionally generated a historical OpenAPI spec and must not be merged.

@zeyu2001 zeyu2001 closed this Sep 5, 2026
@zeyu2001
zeyu2001 deleted the openapi/3641461 branch September 5, 2026 08:58

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e6f5e7ca54

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread openapi.json
Comment on lines +2174 to +2178
"enum": [
"github",
"gitlab",
"bitbucket"
],

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore Azure to the repository provider schema

For organizations with the documented Azure DevOps integration, /repos can return repositories whose provider is azure; the previous public schema explicitly included that value and its Azure-specific providerKey/baseUrl semantics. Narrowing this response enum causes generated clients and response validators to reject legitimate Azure repository payloads, even though platform/repositories/azure-devops.mdx:62-86 still directs customers to connect and select those repositories. Restore azure and the accompanying Azure field descriptions.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant