Skip to content

Handle Mappable Properties #30

Description

@JasonBock

If there's a type that has been set to be mappable, and two properties exist between the source and destination that use that type, I should use the MapTo...() method between them, rather than simply setting one equal to another. Or at least give the user a way to configure that behavior.

There's issues with using the mapping method. I can easily fall into a recursive loop: A has a property of type B, B has a property of type C, C has a property of type A, and....I have to figure out a strategy to catch that and decide what to do with that. Keep going? Have a limit? Let the user configure the behavior?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions