Migration uv ci by raederan · Pull Request #88 · OO-LD/oold-python

raederan · 2026-06-13T09:12:52Z

UV migration as baseline for further OO-LD development in general

Additional Project Management References
Affecting enhancement tasks: #23 | #49 | #52 | #60 | #78 | #82

Replace the pyscaffold/setuptools build with hatchling + hatch-vcs (git-tag versioning preserved) and overhaul dev tooling, CI, and docs. No public API or runtime behavior changes. Build: - Rewrite pyproject.toml to [project] + hatchling + hatch-vcs; migrate runtime deps, UI extras, and dev/test tooling - Remove setup.py, setup.cfg, .isort.cfg, .coveragerc Tooling: - Add Makefile (with benchmark target), ruff pre-commit config, uv-based tox.ini (with benchmark env), .devcontainer/, Dockerfile, comprehensive .gitignore CI: - Add setup-python-env action; main.yml with 3.10-3.14 matrix, ported benchmark job, codecov, and zensical docs check - on-release-main.yml uses uv build/publish + Pages; drop sed version step (hatch-vcs derives version) - Add validate-codecov-config.yml + codecov.yaml; remove ci.yml/docs.yml Docs: - Migrate mkdocs -> zensical (zensical.toml); rewrite dev.md for uv/make Meta: - Update README badges (build/codecov, OO-LD org); add CONTRIBUTING.md Code fixes to pass gates: - Remove unused imports; simplify 8 collapsible-if/ternary cases - Fix missing-assert test bug; resolve B018 unused-expression - Modernize Optional -> | None; drop redundant logging.exception arg - ValueError -> TypeError; pin specific type: ignore codes Lint/type config (justified inline): - Relax RUF012 (pydantic), TRY003/C901 (avoid destructive refactors), A001/A002 (keep property/id/input per rollback), test/example security rules; deptry ignores for runtime-only UI extras - Downgrade ty dynamic-pattern rules (unresolved-attribute, not-subscriptable, etc.): 440 -> 0 errors; unresolved-import stays active for core code Verified: make check (exit 0), make test (95 passed, 3 skipped), uv build (wheel + sdist), zensical build -s (no issues). Note: ty check emits 11 non-fatal warnings (unsupported-base in tests, possibly-missing-submodule); left unsuppressed (exit 0 unaffected). pretty-format-json reindented some .json/.ipynb on first run; tests pass.

…ings deptry emitted advisory warnings (not errors — it already exited Success) for optional UI extras not installed in the lint/type env (jupyter_bokeh, anywidget, ipykernel, traitlets, nicegui). When a declared dependency isn't installed, deptry can't introspect its real import-module name and falls back to guessing, producing the notices. Add explicit [tool.deptry.package_module_name_map] entries in pyproject.toml so deptry uses the stated module names instead of guessing (also maps ipython -> IPython).

When working_dir_path is set, the generator writes JSON schemas back to the source directory. It used indent=4 while the pretty-format-json pre-commit hook expects 2-space indentation, and json.dumps omits a trailing newline that end-of-file-fixer requires. Both caused make test to dirty tracked files, breaking make check on every run. Change indent to 2 and append \n when writing schema files.

…ty and brevity

Rebuild the entire docs site using Zensical with a structured nav, richer content, and consistent make/without-make command coverage. New pages: get-started, how-to (codegen, object-graph-mapping, backends, rdf-export, controller), architecture (Mermaid diagrams), contributing, api (replaces oold.md stub). CONTRIBUTING.md and docs/contributing.md now stay in sync — same sections and commands, docs version adds Zensical tabs for make vs. bare uv. Add CITATION.cff and citation sections to README and docs/index.md, attributed to OO-LD Contributors with Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8374237

github-actions · 2026-06-13T09:14:01Z

📊 Benchmark Results

Click to see benchmark comparison

📊 Benchmark Comparison (threshold: 1.3x)
============================================================

➖ Unchanged (within threshold):
  ➖ test_simple_dict_document_store: 0.0016s → 0.0016s (+0.3%)
  ➖ test_sqlite_document_store: 0.0017s → 0.0017s (-0.4%)
  ➖ test_local_sparql_store: 0.0366s → 0.0396s (+8.2%)
  ➖ test_oneof_subschema: 0.0501s → 0.0598s (+19.3%)
  ➖ test_enum_docstrings: 0.0414s → 0.0522s (+26.1%)
  ➖ test_subclass_inheritance: 0.0448s → 0.0520s (+16.0%)
  ➖ test_class_hierarchy: 0.0424s → 0.0488s (+15.0%)
  ➖ test_core[v1]: 0.0339s → 0.0370s (+9.2%)
  ➖ test_core[v2]: 0.0390s → 0.0417s (+7.0%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v1]: 0.0015s → 0.0015s (+1.1%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v2]: 0.0027s → 0.0027s (+0.7%)
  ➖ test_simple_json: 0.0006s → 0.0006s (+0.5%)
  ➖ test_complex_graph: 0.0014s → 0.0016s (+7.6%)

============================================================
Summary: 0 regressions, 0 improvements, 13 unchanged
============================================================

✅ No significant performance regressions

Threshold: 1.3x (30% slower triggers a regression warning)

Note: Benchmarks are informational only and won't fail the build.

_{💡 Tip: Download the benchmark-results artifact for detailed JSON data}

github-actions · 2026-06-13T09:16:02Z

📊 Benchmark Results

Click to see benchmark comparison

📊 Benchmark Comparison (threshold: 1.3x)
============================================================

➖ Unchanged (within threshold):
  ➖ test_simple_dict_document_store: 0.0018s → 0.0017s (-7.6%)
  ➖ test_sqlite_document_store: 0.0020s → 0.0018s (-8.0%)
  ➖ test_local_sparql_store: 0.0414s → 0.0382s (-7.7%)
  ➖ test_oneof_subschema: 0.0555s → 0.0605s (+9.1%)
  ➖ test_enum_docstrings: 0.0445s → 0.0498s (+12.0%)
  ➖ test_subclass_inheritance: 0.0497s → 0.0563s (+13.3%)
  ➖ test_class_hierarchy: 0.0458s → 0.0493s (+7.6%)
  ➖ test_core[v1]: 0.0360s → 0.0384s (+6.7%)
  ➖ test_core[v2]: 0.0422s → 0.0500s (+18.5%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v1]: 0.0018s → 0.0018s (+0.4%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v2]: 0.0029s → 0.0028s (-5.2%)
  ➖ test_simple_json: 0.0007s → 0.0007s (-0.8%)
  ➖ test_complex_graph: 0.0016s → 0.0016s (+1.0%)

============================================================
Summary: 0 regressions, 0 improvements, 13 unchanged
============================================================

✅ No significant performance regressions

Threshold: 1.3x (30% slower triggers a regression warning)

Note: Benchmarks are informational only and won't fail the build.

_{💡 Tip: Download the benchmark-results artifact for detailed JSON data}

The benchmark job switches branches mid-run to collect baseline metrics (git checkout main → run → git checkout back), which mutates uv.lock on disk. The setup-uv post-step then tries to save cache against a changed workspace state and fails, marking the whole job as failed even though all benchmark steps succeeded. Add an `enable-cache` passthrough input to the setup-python-env composite action (default: true, no change to other jobs) and pass false for the benchmark job where branch-switching makes uv caching unreliable.

github-actions · 2026-06-13T09:24:08Z

📊 Benchmark Results

Click to see benchmark comparison

📊 Benchmark Comparison (threshold: 1.3x)
============================================================

➖ Unchanged (within threshold):
  ➖ test_simple_dict_document_store: 0.0016s → 0.0016s (+0.5%)
  ➖ test_sqlite_document_store: 0.0017s → 0.0017s (-2.8%)
  ➖ test_local_sparql_store: 0.0364s → 0.0368s (+1.0%)
  ➖ test_oneof_subschema: 0.0500s → 0.0577s (+15.5%)
  ➖ test_enum_docstrings: 0.0417s → 0.0466s (+11.7%)
  ➖ test_subclass_inheritance: 0.0448s → 0.0516s (+15.2%)
  ➖ test_class_hierarchy: 0.0422s → 0.0476s (+12.8%)
  ➖ test_core[v1]: 0.0332s → 0.0355s (+6.9%)
  ➖ test_core[v2]: 0.0388s → 0.0409s (+5.6%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v1]: 0.0015s → 0.0015s (-1.0%)
  ➖ test_schema_generation[v2]: 0.0027s → 0.0026s (-1.0%)
  ➖ test_simple_json: 0.0006s → 0.0006s (+0.0%)
  ➖ test_complex_graph: 0.0014s → 0.0015s (+0.4%)

============================================================
Summary: 0 regressions, 0 improvements, 13 unchanged
============================================================

✅ No significant performance regressions

Threshold: 1.3x (30% slower triggers a regression warning)

Note: Benchmarks are informational only and won't fail the build.

_{💡 Tip: Download the benchmark-results artifact for detailed JSON data}

…stall

…README

raederan added 5 commits June 13, 2026 09:48

fix: restore tag-push release trigger; rewrite CONTRIBUTING for clari…

1b3436b

…ty and brevity

raederan requested a review from simontaurus June 13, 2026 09:12

raederan self-assigned this Jun 13, 2026

raederan added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 13, 2026

raederan added 9 commits June 13, 2026 11:27

fix(ci): use git worktree for baseline benchmarks to avoid branch switch

5139d76

docs: fix raw tab artifacts (enable pymdownx.tabbed), lead with uv in…

73ecc54

…stall

docs: add OO-LD logo, fix tab/icon rendering, uv-first install, tidy …

9404a1d

…README

docs: add tabs nav + logo + landing hero, fix page title, tidy README

e16d80c

docs: add landing hero on Home, move old content to new About page

32d22b5

docs: fix + enlarge mermaid diagrams, hide footer on landing page

c87a92d

docs: drop redundant Development page (merged into Contributing)

6c929c2

docs: fix home hero right-side gap and top alignment

c6a9d0b

docs: fix landing hero gradient — seamless yellow to bottom, no footer

b6cc144

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Migration uv ci#88

Migration uv ci#88
raederan wants to merge 15 commits into
mainfrom
migration-uv-ci

raederan commented Jun 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

raederan commented Jun 13, 2026

UV migration as baseline for further OO-LD development in general

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 13, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant