Skip to content

Conversation

@iceljc
Copy link
Collaborator

@iceljc iceljc commented Jan 14, 2026

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Reset reasoning effort level when provider or model changes

  • Remove automatic default reasoning level assignment logic

  • Ensure reasoning level is explicitly set by user, not auto-populated


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Provider/Model Change"] --> B["Reset reasoning_effort_level to null"]
  B --> C["Remove Auto-Default Logic"]
  C --> D["User Explicitly Sets Level"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
chat-config.svelte
Reset reasoning level on provider/model changes                   

src/routes/page/agent/[agentId]/agent-components/llm-configs/chat-config.svelte

  • Added config.reasoning_effort_level = null reset in changeProvider()
    function when model selection changes
  • Added config.reasoning_effort_level = null reset in changeModel()
    function when model is changed
  • Removed automatic default reasoning level assignment logic from
    onModelChanged() function that was overriding user settings
  • Simplified onModelChanged() to only update available reasoning level
    options without modifying config values
+2/-5     

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@iceljc iceljc merged commit 64bdf10 into SciSharp:main Jan 14, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
Possible issue
Clear options when model is null

In onModelChanged, add a check to clear reasoningLevelOptions if config.model is
null or undefined.

src/routes/page/agent/[agentId]/agent-components/llm-configs/chat-config.svelte [138-140]

 function onModelChanged(config) {
-    reasoningLevelOptions = getReasoningLevelOptions(config?.model);
+    if (!config?.model) {
+        reasoningLevelOptions = [];
+    } else {
+        reasoningLevelOptions = getReasoningLevelOptions(config.model);
+    }
 }

[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

__

Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue where reasoningLevelOptions might not be cleared if config.model becomes null, leading to stale data being shown. It proposes a good defensive coding practice.

Low
General
Reset reasoning level before options update

In the changeModel function, move the line config.reasoning_effort_level = null
to before the onModelChanged(config) call.

src/routes/page/agent/[agentId]/agent-components/llm-configs/chat-config.svelte [96-102]

 function changeModel(e) {
     config.is_inherit = false;
     config.model = e.target.value || null;
+    config.reasoning_effort_level = null;
     onModelChanged(config);
-    config.reasoning_effort_level = null;
     handleAgentChange();
 }

[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

__

Why: While the current code is functionally correct due to other changes in the PR, moving the reset of config.reasoning_effort_level before calling onModelChanged improves logical consistency and code clarity.

Low
Ensure consistent state before model change

Ensure reasoning_effort_level is set to null before calling onModelChanged() for
state consistency when the model changes.

src/routes/page/agent/[agentId]/agent-components/llm-configs/chat-config.svelte [89-91]

+config.model = models[0]?.name;
+config.reasoning_effort_level = null;
+onModelChanged(config);
 
-
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2

__

Why: This suggestion is correct but simply describes a change already implemented in the PR. Since the existing_code and improved_code are identical, it offers no new improvement and has very low impact.

Low
  • More

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant