Skip to content

Conversation

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR fixes #11798

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 16.18%. Comparing base (eee43e5) to head (26c0329).
⚠️ Report is 113 commits behind head on 4.20.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../main/java/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...network/dao/PhysicalNetworkTrafficTypeDaoImpl.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriver.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #11846      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     16.17%   16.18%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    13300    13303       +3     
============================================
  Files          5656     5657       +1     
  Lines        498349   498467     +118     
  Branches      60480    60493      +13     
============================================
+ Hits          80597    80692      +95     
- Misses       408778   408795      +17     
- Partials       8974     8980       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.04% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@weizhouapache weizhouapache linked an issue Dec 15, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

Code looks good @weizhouapache , are you still working on this or testing this?

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator

abh1sar commented Jan 5, 2026

@weizhouapache is this ready for review or needs more work?

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@weizhouapache is this ready for review or needs more work?

it is ready for review
thanks for the headsup @abh1sar

@weizhouapache weizhouapache marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 09:29
Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@borisstoyanov borisstoyanov self-assigned this Jan 29, 2026
@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16618

Copy link
Contributor

@borisstoyanov borisstoyanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, manually checked the bug fix

@borisstoyanov borisstoyanov merged commit aef3df7 into apache:4.20 Jan 29, 2026
24 of 25 checks passed
@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM, manually checked the bug fix

great, thanks @borisstoyanov

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland deleted the 4.20-fix-privategw-wrong-network branch January 29, 2026 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

private gateway attach to wrong physical network

6 participants