Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](variant) Recognize nullable array elements as NestedGroup types #66196 - #66202

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-66196-branch-4.1
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1: [fix](variant) Recognize nullable array elements as NestedGroup types #66196#66202
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-66196-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #66196

…#66196)

Related PR: #63088

Problem Summary:

Array elements are nullable after #63088. `get_base_type_of_array()`
therefore returns `Nullable<Variant>` for the NestedGroup physical type,
but `is_nested_group_type()` directly casts that wrapper to
`DataTypeVariant`. The false negative bypasses the NestedGroup-specific
type-conflict policy during Variant merge/compaction.

This PR unwraps the nullable base type only when the input has an Array
dimension. It recognizes `Array<Nullable<Variant>>` as NestedGroup while
preserving the existing classifications of scalar `Variant` and
`Nullable<Variant>`.
@github-actions
github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner July 29, 2026 02:13
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@yiguolei

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skip buildall

@yiguolei
yiguolei merged commit 67ea11c into branch-4.1 Jul 30, 2026
32 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants