Skip to content

Conversation

@majialoong
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #9959

Brief Description

Thread use the correct name prefix.

How Did You Test This Change?

Unit test

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.73%. Comparing base (7fc5452) to head (8de6fcc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #9960      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      48.80%   48.73%   -0.08%     
+ Complexity     12775    12756      -19     
=============================================
  Files           1327     1327              
  Lines          96441    96441              
  Branches       12440    12440              
=============================================
- Hits           47065    46997      -68     
- Misses         43631    43690      +59     
- Partials        5745     5754       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

yuz10
yuz10 previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2026
@lizhimins
Copy link
Member

Good catch. Can you merge the unit tests into one?


@Test
public void testFileRecyclingExecutorThreadNamePrefix() throws Exception {
assertThreadNamePrefix(executor.fileRecyclingExecutor, "FileRecyclingExecutor_",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you merge the unit tests into one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the suggestion. Done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Correct thread name prefix for file recycling executor in tiered store

4 participants