ci: use Rook 1.19.3 and Ceph Tentacle#5672
Conversation
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
The devel branch will use a newer version of Rook and Ceph in the near future. That requires the images to be mirrored in the CI registry. See-also: ceph#5672 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
nixpanic
added
the
ci/skip/multi-arch-build
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
1 similar comment
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
The devel branch will use a newer version of Rook and Ceph in the near future. That requires the images to be mirrored in the CI registry. See-also: #5672 Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
c2dabc9 to
03040f1
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
03040f1 to
870215d
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
870215d to
025e47a
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
025e47a to
a40f06c
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
a40f06c to
9b9119c
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
1 similar comment
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
960e97e to
4b7516f
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
4b7516f to
48a4306
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
1 similar comment
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
b919ccd to
96abede
Compare
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33 |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.35 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd |
|
Deprecation notice: This pull request comes from a fork and was queued with |
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 3 hours 7 minutes 22 seconds in the queue, including 3 hours 7 minutes 5 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
Recent versions of Rook use Ceph-CSI Operator by default. There is no need to have Ceph-CSI deployed by Rook, as our CI deploys it from the PR that is being tested. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
With Ceph Tentacle creating a (the first?) NFS-export fails with:
```
Error EINVAL: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/mgr_module.py", line 2010, in _handle_command
return CLICommand.COMMANDS[cmd['prefix']].call(self, cmd, inbuf)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/mgr_module.py", line 534, in call
return self.func(mgr, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/object_format.py", line 592, in _format_response
robj = f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/nfs/module.py", line 45, in
_cmd_nfs_export_create_cephfs
earmark_resolver = CephFSEarmarkResolver(self)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/mgr_util.py", line 356, in __init__
self._cephfs_client = client or CephfsClient(mgr)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/mgr_util.py", line 318, in __init__
self.connection_pool = CephfsConnectionPool(self.mgr)
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/mgr_util.py", line 223, in __init__
self.timer_task.start()
File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/threading.py", line 899, in start
_start_new_thread(self._bootstrap, ())
RuntimeError: can't start new thread
```
It seems this can only happen when the CLI is used, that means go-ceph
failed to create the export in the first place. It would be useful to
log the go-ceph failure, so that improving is possible.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Use `dd` to sync the data, do not wait for unmounting to flush outstanding I/O (and ignore failed writes). See-also: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73997?#note-27 Co-authored-by: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
ceph-csi-bot
force-pushed
the
testing/ceph-tentacle
branch
from
32a0149 to
049b480
Compare
mergify
Bot
added
ci/in-progress/e2e
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.33 |
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.33 |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33 |
|
/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd |
|
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.35 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.35 |
|
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.35 |
6 participants
Recent versions of Rook use Ceph-CSI Operator by default. There is no need to have Ceph-CSI deployed by Rook, as our CI deploys it from the PR that is being tested.
Rook v1.18.4 works well with Ceph Squid (v19). But for NVMe-oF testing we need a Ceph Tentacle (v20) cluster.
Closes: #5772
Show available bot commands
These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:
/retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the<job-name>after unrelatedfailure (please report the failure too!)