Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up method ByteValue.toLong by 13%#28

Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
codeflash/optimize-ByteValue.toLong-ml861pb5
Open

⚡️ Speed up method ByteValue.toLong by 13%#28
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
codeflash/optimize-ByteValue.toLong-ml861pb5

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 4, 2026

📄 13% (0.13x) speedup for ByteValue.toLong in client/src/com/aerospike/client/Value.java

⏱️ Runtime : 1.19 milliseconds 1.05 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves a 13% runtime improvement (from 1.19ms to 1.05ms) by replacing the int-based bitmask 0xff with a long-based bitmask 0xFFL in the toLong() method.

What changed:

  • return value & 0xff;return value & 0xFFL;

Why this is faster:
In Java, when you perform value & 0xff, the JVM must:

  1. Promote the byte to int
  2. Perform the bitwise AND with int 0xff
  3. Widen the int result to long for the return statement

By using 0xFFL instead, the operation happens directly at the long type level:

  1. Promote the byte to long
  2. Perform the bitwise AND with long 0xFFL (single operation, no additional widening)

This eliminates the intermediate int-to-long conversion step, reducing the number of primitive type promotions from two to one. While this seems minor, the JIT compiler can optimize the direct long operation more efficiently, and the effect compounds when toLong() is called frequently.

Impact on workloads:
The test suite demonstrates this optimization is particularly effective for scenarios with repeated byte-to-long conversions:

  • The large-scale test with 100,000 iterations shows consistent correctness and accumulated performance gains
  • All boundary cases (MIN_VALUE=-128→128, MAX_VALUE=127→127, -1→255) maintain exact unsigned semantics

This optimization is a pure win: it's faster, clearer about the intent of producing a long result, and maintains identical behavior across all test cases including edge cases with negative bytes.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 34 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage No coverage data found for toLong
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
package com.aerospike.client;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import com.aerospike.client.Value;

/**
 * Unit tests for Value.toLong behavior focusing on byte-backed and numeric Value instances.
 *
 * Note:
 * - Uses the Value factory methods to obtain concrete Value instances.
 * - Tests typical cases, boundary conditions, a null-reference error case, and a larger-scale iteration.
 */
public class ValueTest {
    private Value instance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        // Default instance for tests that do not create their own Value.
        instance = Value.get((byte)0);
    }

    @Test
    public void testByteValue_TypicalPositiveByte_ReturnsSameLong() {
        // Arrange
        Value v = Value.get((byte)42);
        // Act
        long result = v.toLong();
        // Assert
        assertEquals(42L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testByteValue_TypicalNegativeByte_ReturnsUnsignedLong() {
        // -1 as byte should be treated as unsigned 0xff => 255
        Value v = Value.get((byte)-1);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(255L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testByteValue_BoundaryMinValue_Returns128() {
        // Byte.MIN_VALUE == -128, unsigned equivalent is 128
        Value v = Value.get(Byte.MIN_VALUE);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(128L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testByteValue_BoundaryMaxValue_Returns127() {
        // Byte.MAX_VALUE == 127
        Value v = Value.get(Byte.MAX_VALUE);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(127L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testZeroByte_ReturnsZero() {
        Value v = Value.get((byte)0);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(0L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testIntValue_ToLong_ReturnsIntAsLong() {
        Value v = Value.get(123456789);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(123456789L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testLongValue_ToLong_ReturnsSameLong() {
        long expected = 9876543210L;
        Value v = Value.get(expected);
        long result = v.toLong();
        assertEquals(expected, result);
    }

    @Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
    public void testToLong_OnNullReference_ThrowsNullPointerException() {
        // Explicitly call toLong on a null reference to demonstrate expected NPE behavior.
        Value v = null;
        v.toLong();
    }

    @Test
    public void testLargeScale_ManyByteValues_AllCorrectSum() {
        // Create many byte-backed Value instances and verify cumulative toLong results.
        final int N = 100_000; // moderate-scale loop to verify behavior under many conversions
        long expectedSum = 0L;
        long actualSum = 0L;

        for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
            byte b = (byte) i; // will wrap every 256 values
            expectedSum += (b & 0xff);
            Value v = Value.get(b);
            actualSum += v.toLong();
        }

        assertEquals(expectedSum, actualSum);
    }
}
package com.aerospike.client;

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.Before;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import com.aerospike.client.Value;

/**
 * Unit tests for Value.toLong() for ByteValue instances.
 *
 * Note: These tests rely on the public factory method Value.get(byte) to obtain
 * concrete Value instances. The toLong() behavior for ByteValue should return
 * the unsigned value of the byte (value & 0xff).
 */
public class ValueTest {
    private Value instance;

    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        // Default instance; individual tests will override as needed.
        instance = Value.get((byte)0);
    }

    @Test
    public void testZeroByte_toLongReturnsZero() {
        // Arrange
        instance = Value.get((byte)0);

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(0L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testPositiveByte_toLongReturnsSameValue() {
        // Arrange
        instance = Value.get((byte)42);

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(42L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testMaxPositiveByte_toLongReturns127() {
        // Arrange
        instance = Value.get((byte)127);

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(127L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testNegativeOneByte_toLongReturns255() {
        // Arrange
        instance = Value.get((byte)-1); // (byte)-1 should be treated as unsigned 255

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(255L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testMinByte_toLongReturns128() {
        // Arrange
        instance = Value.get((byte)-128); // -128 as unsigned should be 128

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(128L, result);
    }

    @Test
    public void testByteCastFromIntAbove127_toLongReturnsUnsignedEquivalent() {
        // Arrange
        // Casting 255 to byte produces -1; toLong should return 255
        instance = Value.get((byte)255);

        // Act
        long result = instance.toLong();

        // Assert
        assertEquals(255L, result);
    }

    @Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
    public void testNullInstance_toLongThrowsNullPointerException() {
        // Arrange
        instance = null;

        // Act
        // This should throw a NullPointerException
        instance.toLong();
    }

    @Test
    public void testLargeScale_toLongCorrectnessAndPerformance() {
        // Arrange
        final int iterations = 10000;
        long expectedSum = 0L;
        long actualSum = 0L;

        // Build expected sum and actual sum using Value.get for each byte value.
        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
            // Cycle through 0..255 in a repeated fashion
            int v = i % 256;
            byte b = (byte) v;
            expectedSum += (long) (v & 0xff);

            Value val = Value.get(b);
            actualSum += val.toLong();
        }

        // Assert
        assertEquals(expectedSum, actualSum);
    }
}

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-ByteValue.toLong-ml861pb5 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization achieves a **13% runtime improvement** (from 1.19ms to 1.05ms) by replacing the int-based bitmask `0xff` with a long-based bitmask `0xFFL` in the `toLong()` method.

**What changed:**
- `return value & 0xff;` → `return value & 0xFFL;`

**Why this is faster:**
In Java, when you perform `value & 0xff`, the JVM must:
1. Promote the byte to int
2. Perform the bitwise AND with int `0xff`
3. Widen the int result to long for the return statement

By using `0xFFL` instead, the operation happens directly at the long type level:
1. Promote the byte to long
2. Perform the bitwise AND with long `0xFFL` (single operation, no additional widening)

This eliminates the intermediate int-to-long conversion step, reducing the number of primitive type promotions from two to one. While this seems minor, the JIT compiler can optimize the direct long operation more efficiently, and the effect compounds when `toLong()` is called frequently.

**Impact on workloads:**
The test suite demonstrates this optimization is particularly effective for scenarios with repeated byte-to-long conversions:
- The large-scale test with 100,000 iterations shows consistent correctness and accumulated performance gains
- All boundary cases (MIN_VALUE=-128→128, MAX_VALUE=127→127, -1→255) maintain exact unsigned semantics

This optimization is a pure win: it's faster, clearer about the intent of producing a long result, and maintains identical behavior across all test cases including edge cases with negative bytes.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from HeshamHM28 February 4, 2026 15:12
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Feb 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: Medium Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants