⚡️ Speed up function capture_code_cell by 6%#45
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function capture_code_cell by 6%#45codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
capture_code_cell by 6%#45codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a 6% speedup through three key optimizations that reduce redundant string operations: **1. Conditional String Replacements** The original code performed `replace()` operations on every source line, even when the target strings weren't present. The optimization adds a conditional check (`if 'get_ipython().run_line_magic' in line or 'get_ipython().magic' in line:`) before performing replacements. This eliminates unnecessary string operations on the majority of lines that don't contain magic commands. **2. Cached String Stripping** The original code called `cell_out.strip()` multiple times - once in the parsing loop condition and again when checking for semicolons. The optimization caches this result in `cell_out_strip` and reuses it, eliminating redundant `strip()` calls. **3. Simplified String Concatenation** The original code used a multi-line triple-quoted f-string for the output capture code, which creates multiple string objects. The optimization replaces this with direct f-string concatenation, reducing memory allocations during string construction. **Performance Impact by Test Case:** - **Large cells with many lines** (1000+ lines): 24-30% faster due to the conditional replacement optimization - **Cells with magic commands**: Modest improvements as only relevant lines are processed - **Standard small cells**: 1-3% improvements from cached stripping and string optimizations - **Edge cases**: Minimal impact, maintaining same functionality The optimizations are most effective for large cells with many non-magic lines, where the conditional replacement check provides the biggest benefit by avoiding thousands of unnecessary string operations.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 6% (0.06x) speedup for
capture_code_cellinpanel/io/handlers.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.97 milliseconds→1.86 milliseconds(best of55runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 6% speedup through three key optimizations that reduce redundant string operations:
1. Conditional String Replacements
The original code performed
replace()operations on every source line, even when the target strings weren't present. The optimization adds a conditional check (if 'get_ipython().run_line_magic' in line or 'get_ipython().magic' in line:) before performing replacements. This eliminates unnecessary string operations on the majority of lines that don't contain magic commands.2. Cached String Stripping
The original code called
cell_out.strip()multiple times - once in the parsing loop condition and again when checking for semicolons. The optimization caches this result incell_out_stripand reuses it, eliminating redundantstrip()calls.3. Simplified String Concatenation
The original code used a multi-line triple-quoted f-string for the output capture code, which creates multiple string objects. The optimization replaces this with direct f-string concatenation, reducing memory allocations during string construction.
Performance Impact by Test Case:
The optimizations are most effective for large cells with many non-magic lines, where the conditional replacement check provides the biggest benefit by avoiding thousands of unnecessary string operations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
io/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expressionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expression_semicolonio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expression_with_commentio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_functionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_loopio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_multi_line_expressionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_statementio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_expression_multi_line_with_comment🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-capture_code_cell-mhbm4s9nand push.