You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like this idea as well. If we can have the report generate a list or summary of "external" contributors (i.e. not members of the organization), that would be really nice. We love our "external" contributor community and would like to acknowledge their contributions explicitly.
My team has a similar need, and we would actually want to get more granular and filter by team membership. We work in a large team, and we often want to see the effects of our work on the community, but also on other Hubbers that aren't a part of our team.
My team has a similar need, and we would actually want to get more granular and filter by team membership. We work in a large team, and we often want to see the effects of our work on the community, but also on other Hubbers that aren't a part of our team.
@hectorsector to confirm, you're looking to filter by one or more team names? If we filter on multiple we'd want the team name in the output, correct? Do we have any security concerns of sharing a user's team name? Typically team names are not exposed publicly (I may have to triple check this). I assume that is to avoid spam.
you're looking to filter by one or more team names? If we filter on multiple we'd want the team name in the output
That's correct. Team name would contain org information as well so something like @github/docs-localization.
Do we have any security concerns of sharing a user's team name? Typically team names are not exposed publicly (I may have to triple check this). I assume that is to avoid spam.
Team names are already used in public issues when at-mentioning that team, although visibility of the team members is restricted.
For our specific use case, we don't need the team name published as long as we can filter by that team information, if that helps.
Activity
cicdguy commentedon Nov 30, 2023
I like this idea as well. If we can have the report generate a list or summary of "external" contributors (i.e. not members of the organization), that would be really nice. We love our "external" contributor community and would like to acknowledge their contributions explicitly.
zkoppert commentedon Apr 12, 2024
Similar GitHub request,
hectorsector commentedon May 13, 2024
My team has a similar need, and we would actually want to get more granular and filter by team membership. We work in a large team, and we often want to see the effects of our work on the community, but also on other Hubbers that aren't a part of our team.
jmeridth commentedon May 15, 2024
@hectorsector to confirm, you're looking to filter by one or more team names? If we filter on multiple we'd want the team name in the output, correct? Do we have any security concerns of sharing a user's team name? Typically team names are not exposed publicly (I may have to triple check this). I assume that is to avoid spam.
hectorsector commentedon May 17, 2024
That's correct. Team name would contain org information as well so something like
@github/docs-localization.Team names are already used in public issues when at-mentioning that team, although visibility of the team members is restricted.
For our specific use case, we don't need the team name published as long as we can filter by that team information, if that helps.
github-actions commentedon Nov 30, 2024
This issue is stale because it has been open 21 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days.