Update Rust crate `tokio` to v1.52.2 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8703 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-06T07:31:25Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tokio (source)	workspace.dependencies	patch	`1.52.1` → `1.52.2`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

tokio-rs/tokio (tokio)

`v1.52.2`: Tokio v1.52.2

Compare Source

1.52.2 (May 4th, 2026)

This release reverts the LIFO slot stealing change introduced in 1.51.0 (#7431), due to its performance impact. (#8100)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-06T07:31:27Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:44am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:44am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:44am

cursor · 2026-05-06T07:31:34Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Patch-updates tokio, which can affect async scheduling and runtime behavior across the workspace. Lockfile changes also shift transitive Windows-related crates and winnow resolution, so CI/runtime smoke tests are important.

Overview
Updates the Rust async runtime dependency tokio from 1.52.1 to 1.52.2 (lockfile refresh).

The Cargo.lock update also adjusts transitive dependency resolution, including multiple windows-sys version selections and consolidating winnow references to a single resolved version.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6394c08. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-05-06T07:32:56Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust async runtime dependency tokio in the workspace.

Changes:

Bumps tokio from 1.52.1 to 1.52.2 (patch release)
Regenerates the lockfile to reflect the new tokio version and transitive dependency resolution

Technical Notes: Tokio 1.52.2 primarily reverts a LIFO slot-stealing behavior change due to performance impact, so runtime scheduling characteristics may change back to pre-1.51 behavior.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-06T07:35:52Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.08%. Comparing base (e8f59de) to head (6394c08).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8703      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1341              
  Lines      135078   135078              
  Branches     5744     5744              
==========================================
- Hits        83862    83859       -3     
- Misses      50308    50311       +3     
  Partials      908      908

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-06T07:37:52Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/rs/tokio-1.x-lockfile (6394c08) with main (e8f59de)}

github-actions · 2026-05-06T08:53:56Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.533 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.829 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.292 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.989 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.660 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.294 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.984 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.982 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$61.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.721 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$321 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}16.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.679 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.967 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 658 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$147 \mathrm{ms} \pm 597 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 655 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 609 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 587 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 597 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 619 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$158 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.34 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.624 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$555 \mathrm{ms} \pm 903 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Rust crate tokio to v1.52.2

6394c08

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 6, 2026 07:31

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 6, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 6, 2026 07:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 6, 2026 07:34 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 6, 2026 07:44 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update Rust crate `tokio` to v1.52.2#8703

Update Rust crate `tokio` to v1.52.2#8703
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/tokio-1.x-lockfile

hash-worker Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 6, 2026

Release Notes

v1.52.2: Tokio v1.52.2

1.52.2 (May 4th, 2026)

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 6, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

`v1.52.2`: Tokio v1.52.2

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading