Update Rust crate `tower-http` to v0.6.9 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8704 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-06T07:31:39Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tower-http	workspace.dependencies	patch	`0.6.8` → `0.6.9`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

tower-rs/tower-http (tower-http)

`v0.6.9`

Compare Source

Added:

on-early-drop: middleware that detects when a response future or response
body is dropped before completion (#636)

Two events get hooks: the response future being dropped before
the inner service produces a response, and the response body being
dropped before reaching end-of-stream.

Install custom callbacks with OnEarlyDropLayer::builder():

use http::Request;
use tower_http::on_early_drop::{OnBodyDropFn, OnEarlyDropLayer};

let layer = OnEarlyDropLayer::builder()
    .on_future_drop(|req: &Request<()>| {
        let uri = req.uri().clone();
        move || eprintln!("future dropped for {}", uri)
    })
    .on_body_drop(OnBodyDropFn::new(|req: &Request<()>| {
        let uri = req.uri().clone();
        move |parts: &http::response::Parts| {
            let status = parts.status;
            move || eprintln!("body dropped for {} status {}", uri, status)
        }
    }));

Or route both events through a trace::OnFailure hook with
EarlyDropsAsFailures. Place this layer inside a TraceLayer so the
emitted events inherit the request span:

use tower::ServiceBuilder;
use tower_http::on_early_drop::{OnEarlyDropLayer, EarlyDropsAsFailures};
use tower_http::trace::{DefaultOnFailure, TraceLayer};

let stack = ServiceBuilder::new()
    .layer(TraceLayer::new_for_http())
    .layer(OnEarlyDropLayer::new(
        EarlyDropsAsFailures::new(DefaultOnFailure::default()),
    ));

fs: make AsyncReadBody::with_capacity public (#415)

Changed:

The implicit async-compression feature is removed (#642)
The implicit tokio feature is removed (#628)
fs: no longer auto-enables the tracing crate feature; enable tracing
explicitly to restore error logging on ServeDir IO failures (#614)

Fixed

trace: restore failure classification at end-of-stream (#483)
follow-redirect: support unicode URLs (swaps iri-string dep for
url) (#646)
fs: reject reserved Windows DOS device names (CON, COM1, etc.) in
ServeDir (#663)

All the PRs

ci: update deny action to v2 by @seanmonstar in #627
chore: improve code comments clarity by @xibeiyoumian in #626
ci: Update to actions/checkout v6 by @tottoto in #629
ci: msrv resolver by @seanmonstar in #635
chore: Remove resolved cargo-deny config by @tottoto in #631
ci: Update to cargo-check-external-types 0.4.0 by @tottoto in #633
examples: Use typed default value clap config by @tottoto in #634
examples: Disable unused reqwest feature by @tottoto in #632
examples: Update to reqwest 0.13 by @tottoto in #640
Fix clippy warnings in warp-key-value-store example by @jplatte in #637
ci: Use Swatinem/rust-cache@v2 to cache by @tottoto in #644
ci: Remove unused working-directory config by @tottoto in #645
Use cargo-deny graph config by @tottoto in #639
Fix: follow redirect unicode in #646
doc: remove mention of deprecated bearer method in lib.rs comment by @VojtaStanek in #641
Allow Unicode-3.0 license by @tottoto in #648
fix(docs): typo by @carlocorradini in #649
fix: remove unused GzEncoder import in decompression in #647
docs: update Example server in #652
Don't automatically enable tracing for fs feature by @ginnyTheCat in #614
examples: Remove unnecessary trait bound by @tottoto in #651
Remove implicit async-compression feature by @tottoto in #642
fix clippy warnings by @alexanderkjall in #659
Check for reserved DOS names by @Darksonn in #663
enable clippy for tower-http and fix current issues by @GlenDC in #407
chore: remove implicit tokio feature by @WaterWhisperer in #628
trace: adds back call to classify_eos on trailers by @markdingram in #483
Make AsyncReadBody::with_capacity public by @bouk in #415
examples: Use axum::body::to_bytes by @tottoto in #650
ci: Remove unnecessary protoc setup by @tottoto in #665
feat(on-early-drop): Add middleware for client early drop detection by @fbergero in #636
chore: release tower-http 0.6.9 by @jlizen in #666

New Contributors

@xibeiyoumian made their first contribution in #626
@VojtaStanek made their first contribution in #641
@carlocorradini made their first contribution in #649
@ginnyTheCat made their first contribution in #614
@alexanderkjall made their first contribution in #659
@Darksonn made their first contribution in #663
@WaterWhisperer made their first contribution in #628
@bouk made their first contribution in #415
@fbergero made their first contribution in #636
@jlizen made their first contribution in #666

Full Changelog: tower-rs/tower-http@tower-http-0.6.8...tower-http-0.6.9

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-06T07:31:42Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:43am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:43am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 7:43am

cursor · 2026-05-06T07:31:47Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Primarily a dependency update, but it changes tower-http behavior and its transitive dependency graph (notably redirect/URL handling), which could subtly affect HTTP middleware at runtime.

Overview
Updates the Rust dependency lockfile to use tower-http 0.6.9 (from 0.6.8).

This refreshes related transitive dependencies, including swapping tower-http's redirect URL parsing from iri-string to url, and adjusts several windows-sys/winnow lock entries as a result.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 338ad46. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-05-06T07:33:32Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust crate tower-http from v0.6.8 to v0.6.9 (Renovate patch update), reflected in Cargo.lock.

Changes:

Refreshes the lockfile to pull in tower-http 0.6.9 and its transitive dependency updates.
Brings upstream fixes (e.g., trace end-of-stream failure classification, unicode redirect URLs, and stricter ServeDir path handling) plus the new on-early-drop middleware.

Technical Notes: Upstream removed implicit tokio/async-compression feature enabling and fs no longer auto-enables tracing, so any consumers relying on those implicit features may need explicit feature flags.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-06T07:35:16Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.08%. Comparing base (e8f59de) to head (338ad46).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8704      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1341              
  Lines      135078   135078              
  Branches     5744     5744              
==========================================
- Hits        83862    83859       -3     
- Misses      50308    50311       +3     
  Partials      908      908

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-06T07:37:35Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/rs/tower-rust-crates (338ad46) with main (e8f59de)}

github-actions · 2026-05-06T08:51:45Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.391 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.705 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$55.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.700 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.913 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$98.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 569 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$296 \mathrm{ms} \pm 930 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.212 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$36.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 678 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 480 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 444 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 670 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 567 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.938 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 625 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 607 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$156 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.41 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$571 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.08 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Rust crate tower-http to v0.6.9

338ad46

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 6, 2026 07:31

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 6, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 6, 2026 07:34 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 6, 2026 07:35 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 6, 2026 07:43 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update Rust crate `tower-http` to v0.6.9#8704

Update Rust crate `tower-http` to v0.6.9#8704
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/tower-rust-crates

hash-worker Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 6, 2026

Release Notes

v0.6.9

Added:

Changed:

Fixed

All the PRs

New Contributors

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 6, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

`v0.6.9`

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading