H-6664: Introduce Python monorepo infrastructure and formalize python repo-chores

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR establishes a first-class Python workspace for the monorepo, built on a single uv workspace rooted at a new pyproject.toml. All Python packages share one lockfile (uv.lock), one virtual environment, and workspace-level tooling: ruff for linting and formatting, ty for type checking, tach for import-boundary enforcement, and pytest for tests.

A new Python package, libs/@local/repo-chores/python (hash-repo-chores), acts as the Python counterpart to the existing Rust sync-turborepo tooling. It provides a repo-chores CLI with two subcommands:

• sync — enforces workspace invariants: explicit uv workspace membership, uniform requires-python bounds, shared ruff/pytest dev pins, and per-member package.json turbo wiring (@python/<name> with managed lint:ruff, fix:ruff, and test:unit scripts).
• prune — extends the existing turbo prune logic (previously a standalone script at .github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py) to also stub out pruned uv workspace members, keeping the pruned output a valid uv workspace.

CI gains a lint:python step that runs uv sync --locked (lockfile stability), repo-chores sync --check (workspace drift), ruff, ty, and tach. A fix:python step applies ruff autofixes and refreshes the lock. A sync:python mise task regenerates all managed wiring after adding, removing, or renaming a Python package. The lefthook pre-commit hook gains a Python entry that runs ruff on staged .py files.

🔍 What does this change?

• Adds a root pyproject.toml and uv.lock establishing the uv workspace, pinned to Python 3.14, with ruff, ty, tach, and pytest configured workspace-wide.
• Introduces libs/@local/repo-chores/python (hash-repo-chores) with modules for workspace discovery (workspace.py), TOML in-place editing (toml_edit.py), workspace sync (sync.py), turbo pruning (prune.py), and a CLI entry point (cli.py).
• Moves .github/actions/prune-repository/prune.py into libs/@local/repo-chores/python/repo_chores/prune.py, refactoring it to be path-aware, stdlib-only, and callable both directly and via repo-chores prune. Adds stub_missing_uv_members so pruned uv workspace members are stubbed back in alongside Cargo stubs.
• Updates the prune-repository GitHub Action to invoke the script from its new location and to copy pyproject.toml and uv.lock into the pruned output.
• Adds mise tasks lint:python, fix:python, and sync:python wrapping the corresponding uv/repo-chores invocations.
• Adds lint:python and fix:python yarn scripts in the root package.json delegating to the mise tasks.
• Adds lint:ruff and fix:ruff turbo pipeline entries so per-package ruff runs participate in the turbo graph.
• Extends the CI lint workflow to detect and run lint:ruff per package and to run yarn lint:python globally.
• Adds .ruff_cache to .gitignore and .dockerignore.
• Adds a lefthook pre-commit hook that runs ruff check and format on staged Python files.
• Bumps uv from 0.11.18 to 0.11.28 with updated checksums for all platforms.
• Documents the Python workspace setup in README.md and AGENTS.md, including how to add packages, run checks, and interpret the sync tooling.
• Adds a full test suite for hash-repo-chores covering prune logic, workspace discovery, sync check/fix/idempotency, and assemble_package_json.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this

🛡 What tests cover this?

• New pytest suite in libs/@local/repo-chores/python/tests/ covering test_prune.py, test_sync.py, and test_workspace.py with a shared conftest.py fixture repository.

❓ How to test this?

1. Run mise install to provision uv 0.11.28.
2. Run uv sync to create the virtual environment.
3. Run mise run lint:python and confirm all checks pass.
4. Run mise run fix:python and confirm ruff autofixes apply cleanly.
5. Run mise run sync:python and confirm no drift is reported on a second mise run lint:python.
6. Run uv run --frozen pytest libs/@local/repo-chores/python/tests and confirm all tests pass.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 4, 2026 8:16am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 4, 2026 8:16am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 4, 2026 8:16am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Broad CI and monorepo wiring changes plus petrinaut-opt runtime/Docker and dependency upgrades; incorrect prune or lock handling could break builds, but scope is mostly tooling and one service.

Overview
Introduces a root uv workspace (Python 3.14, shared uv.lock, ruff/ty/tach/pytest) and hash-repo-chores with sync, lint, and prune so membership, bounded deps, generated @python/* package.json wiring, and turbo-prune stubs stay enforced in CI.

Developer and CI wiring: new mise tasks lint:python, fix:python, and sync:python; root yarn lint:python / fix:python; per-package lint:ruff in the lint workflow; lefthook ruff on staged .py files; prune action moved to libs/@local/repo-chores/python/repo_chores/prune.py and now copies pyproject.toml / uv.lock. uv is bumped to 0.11.28.

petrinaut-opt joins the workspace as @python/petrinaut-optimization (turbo package-based deploy instead of path filters), Docker installs via root lock + --package petrinaut-optimization, Python 3.14, tighter deps, and refactors (Pydantic types, shared SSE admission, OpenAPI JsonValue + contract tests). Docs updated in README.md and AGENTS.md.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 479113a. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[indietyp]

• H-6664: Introduce Python monorepo infrastructure and formalize python repo-chores #9039 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing bm/h-6664-python-monorepo-infrastructure (8a662f1) with main (0cb749d)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (0465623) during the generation of this report, so 0cb749d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.880 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.332 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.29 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$89.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$79.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$268 \mathrm{ms} \pm 850 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.895 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.895 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.113 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$65.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$83.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$72.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 428 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 641 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$529 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:

• ❌ 1 vulnerable package(s)
• ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
• ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
• ⚠️ 32 package(s) with unknown licenses.

See the Details below.

Vulnerabilities

uv.lock

Name	Version	Vulnerability	Severity	Patched Version
gitpython	3.1.50	GitPython unsafe clone option gate bypass through joined short options	high	3.1.51
		GitPython: Command Injection via git long-option prefix abbreviation bypass of CVE-2026-42215 blocklist	high	3.1.51
		GitPython: command injection via unguarded Git options in `Repo.archive()`, `git.ls_remote()`, and arbitrary file overwrite via `Repo.iter_commits()` / `Repo.blame()`	high	3.1.51
		GitPython: Environment-variable exfiltration via os.path.expandvars() on Repo.clone_from() URL	high	3.1.52
		GitPython: git-config section-name injection enables arbitrary config directives (core.sshCommand RCE)	high	3.1.53
		GitPython: Arbitrary file overwrite via git diff --output argument injection in Diffable.diff (key- and value-controlled)	high	3.1.54
		GitPython: Incomplete unsafe_git_clone_options denylist omits --template enabling arbitrary command execution via clone hooks	high	3.1.54
		GitPython: Unsafe git option guard bypass via single-character kwarg value token smuggling enables arbitrary command execution	high	3.1.54
		GitPython: Environment-variable exfiltration via Repo.create_remote() / Remote.add() URL (incomplete fix of GHSA-rwj8-pgh3-r573)	high	3.1.55
		GitPython: Unguarded git option forwarding in IndexFile.checkout() and TagReference.create() enables arbitrary file overwrite and arbitrary file read	high	3.1.57
		GitPython: Incomplete unsafe_git_archive_options denylist omits --add-file / --add-virtual-file, enabling arbitrary file read via Repo.archive()	moderate	3.1.57
		GitPython: Arbitrary file truncation via git rev-list --output argument injection in unguarded Commit.count	moderate	3.1.56

License Issues

apps/petrinaut-opt/package.json

Package	Version	License	Issue Type
@hashintel/petrinaut-cli	workspace:*	Null	Unknown License

libs/@local/repo-chores/python/pyproject.toml

Package	Version	License	Issue Type
packaging	>= 26.2,< 27	Null	Unknown License
tomlkit	>= 0.15,< 0.16	Null	Unknown License

uv.lock

Package	Version	License	Issue Type
alembic	1.18.5	Null	Unknown License
anyio	4.14.2	Null	Unknown License
fastapi	0.139.2	Null	Unknown License
greenlet	3.5.3	Null	Unknown License
grpcio	1.82.1	Null	Unknown License
httpcore2	2.7.0	Null	Unknown License
httptools	0.8.0	Null	Unknown License
httpx2	2.7.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-api	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-instrumentation	0.65b0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi	0.65b0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi	0.65b0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-proto	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-sdk	1.44.0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	0.65b0	Null	Unknown License
opentelemetry-util-http	0.65b0	Null	Unknown License
optuna	4.9.0	Null	Unknown License
ruff	0.15.21	Null	Unknown License
sqlalchemy	2.0.51	Null	Unknown License
tach	0.35.0	Null	Unknown License
tomlkit	0.15.0	Null	Unknown License
tqdm	4.69.0	Null	Unknown License
websockets	16.1.1	Null	Unknown License
wrapt	2.2.2	Null	Unknown License
certifi	2026.7.22	Null	Unknown License

yarn.lock

Package	Version	License	Issue Type
@python/hash-repo-chores@workspace:libs/	0.0.0-use.local	Null	Unknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scorecard details

Package	Version	Score	Details
npm/@hashintel/petrinaut-cli	workspace:*	Unknown	Unknown
npm/@python/petrinaut-optimization	workspace:*	Unknown	Unknown
pip/packaging	>= 26.2,< 27	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tomlkit	>= 0.15,< 0.16	Unknown	Unknown
pip/gitpython	3.1.50	🟢 7.5	Details Check Score Reason Code-Review 🟢 4 Found 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Maintained 🟢 10 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Token-Permissions 🟢 9 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed License 🟢 10 license file detected Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection 🟢 3 branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches SAST 🟢 10 SAST tool is run on all commits
pip/alembic	1.18.5	Unknown	Unknown
pip/annotated-doc	0.0.4	Unknown	Unknown
pip/annotated-types	0.7.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/anyio	4.14.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/asgiref	3.12.1	🟢 4.3	Details Check Score Reason Code-Review 🟢 5 Found 14/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5 Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Maintained 🟢 10 18 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed License 🟢 10 license file detected Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ 0 branch protection not enabled on development/release branches Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/certifi	2026.7.22	🟢 6.4	Details Check Score Reason Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Maintained 🟢 10 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review 🟢 3 Found 1/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Token-Permissions 🟢 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 5 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found License 🟢 9 license file detected Branch-Protection ⚠️ 0 branch protection not enabled on development/release branches Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/charset-normalizer	3.4.9	Unknown	Unknown
pip/click	8.4.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/colorama	0.4.6	Unknown	Unknown
pip/colorlog	6.11.0	🟢 4.9	Details Check Score Reason Code-Review ⚠️ 2 Found 5/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Maintained 🟢 10 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed License 🟢 10 license file detected Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/fastapi	0.139.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/gitdb	4.0.12	🟢 6.1	Details Check Score Reason Maintained ⚠️ 0 project is archived Code-Review 🟢 6 Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Security-Policy 🟢 9 security policy file detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Token-Permissions 🟢 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed License 🟢 9 license file detected Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ 0 branch protection not enabled on development/release branches SAST 🟢 6 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
pip/googleapis-common-protos	1.75.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/greenlet	3.5.3	Unknown	Unknown
pip/grpcio	1.82.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/h11	0.16.0	🟢 4.4	Details Check Score Reason Code-Review 🟢 5 Found 9/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5 Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Maintained ⚠️ 0 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected License 🟢 10 license file detected Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/httpcore2	2.7.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/httptools	0.8.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/httpx2	2.7.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/idna	3.18	Unknown	Unknown
pip/iniconfig	2.3.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/mako	1.3.12	Unknown	Unknown
pip/markdown-it-py	4.2.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/markupsafe	3.0.3	Unknown	Unknown
pip/mdurl	0.1.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/networkx	3.6.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/numpy	2.5.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-api	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-instrumentation	0.65b0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi	0.65b0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi	0.65b0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-proto	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-sdk	1.44.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	0.65b0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/opentelemetry-util-http	0.65b0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/optuna	4.9.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/packaging	26.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pluggy	1.6.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/prompt-toolkit	3.0.52	Unknown	Unknown
pip/protobuf	7.35.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pydantic	2.13.4	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pydantic-core	2.46.4	🟢 7	Details Check Score Reason Code-Review 🟢 7 Found 22/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 Maintained 🟢 10 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 8 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 License 🟢 10 license file detected Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Branch-Protection 🟢 3 branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/pydot	4.0.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pygments	2.20.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pyparsing	3.3.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pytest	9.1.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/python-dotenv	1.2.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/pyyaml	6.0.3	Unknown	Unknown
pip/requests	2.34.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/rich	15.0.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/ruff	0.15.21	Unknown	Unknown
pip/smmap	5.0.3	Unknown	Unknown
pip/sqlalchemy	2.0.51	Unknown	Unknown
pip/starlette	1.3.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tach	0.35.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tomli	2.4.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tomli-w	1.2.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tomlkit	0.15.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/tqdm	4.69.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/truststore	0.10.4	Unknown	Unknown
pip/ty	0.0.58	Unknown	Unknown
pip/typing-extensions	4.16.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/typing-inspection	0.4.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/urllib3	2.7.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/uvicorn	0.51.0	Unknown	Unknown
pip/uvloop	0.22.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/watchfiles	1.2.0	🟢 4	Details Check Score Reason Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Maintained 🟢 5 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5 Code-Review 🟢 3 Found 9/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected License 🟢 10 license file detected Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/wcwidth	0.8.2	Unknown	Unknown
pip/websockets	16.1.1	Unknown	Unknown
pip/wrapt	2.2.2	Unknown	Unknown
npm/@python/hash-repo-chores@workspace:libs/	0.0.0-use.local	Unknown	Unknown

Scanned Files

• apps/petrinaut-opt/package.json
• apps/petrinaut-opt/uv.lock
• libs/@local/petrinaut-optimizer-client/package.json
• libs/@local/repo-chores/python/pyproject.toml
• uv.lock
• yarn.lock

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want reviews to match your repository better? Bugbot Learning can learn team-specific rules from PR activity. A team admin can enable Learning in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ebb40a5. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Docker build breaks after workspace move

High Severity

Raising requires-python to >=3.14,<3.15 and moving the lockfile to the repo-root uv.lock leaves apps/petrinaut-opt/docker/Dockerfile inconsistent: it still uses Python 3.13, uv 0.11.18, and COPYs the removed package-local uv.lock. Deploy builds that use this Dockerfile will fail at the dependency layer.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ebb40a5. Configure here.}

[semgrep-code-hashintel]

Semgrep identified a blocking 🔴 issue in your code:

Dependency cooldown period set to 5 days instead of recommended 7 days, allowing resolution of potentially malicious newly-published packages.

More details about this

The exclude-newer setting in [tool.uv] is configured to only 5 days, which is shorter than the recommended 7-day dependency cooldown period. This means your build can resolve package versions published less than 7 days ago, including newly released versions that may be malicious, unstable, or have undiscovered vulnerabilities.

Exploit scenario: An attacker could publish a malicious version of a popular dependency on day 1, then wait 5 days. When your CI/CD pipeline runs after day 5, uv will resolve and include this malicious package version in your build, potentially injecting backdoors or data exfiltration code into your application and all downstream consumers.

The problematic line is exclude-newer = "5 days" which falls short of the 7-day safety threshold.

To resolve this comment:

✨ Commit fix suggestion

Suggested change

	exclude-newer = "5 days" # mirrors npm release age
	# Root of the Python workspace. Shared configuration for every Python package
	# in the repository lives here; per-package manifests only declare identity and
	# dependencies. Generated sections are kept correct by `mise run sync:python`
	# (see libs/@local/repo-chores/python) and validated in CI.
	[project]
	description = "Workspace-level Python configuration for the HASH monorepo"
	name = "hash"
	version = "0.0.0"
	# The single source of truth for the workspace Python version: every member
	# must declare exactly the same bound, enforced by `repo-chores sync --check`.
	requires-python = ">=3.14,<3.15"
	[tool.uv]
	add-bounds = "major" # require cargo-style bounded ranges (>=1.2.3, <2.0.0)
	exclude-newer = "7 days" # mirrors npm release age
	package = false
	[tool.uv.workspace]
	# Managed by `mise run sync:python`
	members = [
	"apps/petrinaut-opt",
	"libs/@local/repo-chores/python",
	]
	[dependency-groups]
	dev = [
	"hash-repo-chores", # workspace tooling
	"pytest>=9.1.1,<10",
	"ruff>=0.15.21,<0.16",
	"tach>=0.35,<0.36",
	"ty>=0.0.58,<0.1",
	]
	[tool.uv.sources]
	hash-repo-chores = { workspace = true }
	[tool.pytest.ini_options]
	addopts = "-q --import-mode=importlib"
	# Managed by `mise run sync:python`
	testpaths = [
	"apps/petrinaut-opt/tests",
	"libs/@local/repo-chores/python/tests",
	]
	# Managed by `mise run sync:python`. A member's tests import its modules by the
	# names its own directory exposes, the way its own pytest configuration does, so

View step-by-step instructions

1. Update the exclude-newer value under [tool.uv] from 5 days to at least 7 days.
   For example, change it to exclude-newer = "7 days".

2. Keep the setting in the [tool.uv] section so uv applies the cooldown during dependency resolution.
   This makes uv avoid package releases newer than the configured age.

3. If you want a longer buffer, use a larger valid duration such as exclude-newer = "14 days", but do not keep it below 7 days.

💬 Ignore this finding

Reply with Semgrep commands to ignore this finding.

• /fp <comment> for false positive
• /ar <comment> for acceptable risk
• /other <comment> for all other reasons

Alternatively, triage in Semgrep AppSec Platform to ignore the finding created by uv-missing-dependency-cooldown.

_{You can view more details about this finding in the Semgrep AppSec Platform.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 54 out of 59 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Suppressed comments (1)

libs/@local/repo-chores/python/pyproject.toml:15

• hatchling is an unbounded build dependency, so installing hash-repo-chores can select an arbitrary future backend release even when uv.lock is unchanged. This also bypasses the new policy: lint_workspace only checks project and dev dependencies (repo_chores/lint.py:238), while AGENTS.md states that Python dependency ranges are bounded on both sides. Add a bounded hatchling requirement and extend the dependency lint (with a regression test) to cover [build-system].requires so the invariant remains enforceable.

[vilkinsons]

@indietyp Please request my review directly (on behalf of legal) when this is passing/ready