Update GitHub Action hashintel/.github to 8c1a3b1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
hashintel/.github (changelog)	action	digest	89ff06b → 8c1a3b1

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Disabled because a matching PR was automerged previously.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 6, 2026 12:27pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 6, 2026 12:27pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 6, 2026 12:27pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
CI-only digest pins with no application or runtime behavior changes in this repo.

Overview
Pins all reusable workflow references from hashintel/.github to digest 8c1a3b18a4f6528fc8eabcf9acda7780a1e47776 (was 9957be5…), across housekeeping Renovate, preflight dependency checks, PR title validation, and todo-comment scanning.

No workflow inputs, triggers, or local job logic change—only the upstream commit SHA on those uses: lines.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit da8c693. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/gha/hashintel-.github-digest (da8c693) with main (07b572c)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (4877809) during the generation of this report, so 07b572c was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.541 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$88.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$281 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$66.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 550 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$77.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$86.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$92.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$71.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 454 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.795 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 722 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$527 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.23 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph