Remove outdated Routescan explorer entry - #651
Conversation
## Summary * Checked Routescan's official list of supported chains. * Ink is no longer listed among the supported networks. * Removed the outdated Routescan explorer entry from the documentation.
kutluhaneth46
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review
Diff is clean: drops the Routescan section and leaves Blockscout / OKX / Tenderly intact.
One thing I’d like confirmed before merge (I’m not a maintainer — advisory only):
- Is Routescan intentionally unsupported for Ink now, or just the
57073.routescan.io/sepolia.inkonscan.xyzURLs gone stale? - If only the URLs changed, updating the links may be preferable to removing the explorer entirely.
If maintainers have already decided to delist Routescan, this looks good as-is.
Thanks for your reply!
Based on this, I conclude that they no longer support the Ink network. |
kutluhaneth46
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verified against Routescan supported-chains docs — Ink no longer listed. LGTM.
|
@kutluhaneth46 Could you please tell me how often the maintainer reviews PRs? Do you notify them, or do they review them on their own when they have time? |
|
I'm not an Ink maintainer — just a community reviewer — so I don't have a special notify path. From what I've seen, maintainers typically pick up PRs on their own schedule when they have bandwidth; tagging them repeatedly usually doesn't speed it up. Your Routescan delist looks solid given their supported-chains list no longer includes Ink. I'd leave this as-is and wait for a maintainer pass. Thanks for the careful write-up! |

Summary
Inkis no longer listed among thesupported networks.Routescanexplorer entry from the documentation.