Skip to content

chore: Remove semantic branch name and target branch checks#65

Merged
rmi22186 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/remove-reusable-workflows
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

chore: Remove semantic branch name and target branch checks#65
rmi22186 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/remove-reusable-workflows

Conversation

@rmi22186
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rmi22186 rmi22186 commented Apr 2, 2026

Background

  • The semantic branch name and gitflow target branch checks are overly restrictive for the current workflow and block valid PRs (e.g., from forks or non-standard branch names).

What Has Changed

  • Removed pr-branch-check-name (semantic branch name check)
  • Removed pr-branch-target-gitflow (semantic target branch check)
  • Kept pr-title-check (semantic PR title check)

Screenshots/Video

  • N/A

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have tested this locally.

Additional Notes

  • N/A

Reference Issue (For employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

  • N/A

Remove pr-branch-check-name and pr-branch-target-gitflow checks,
keeping only the PR title check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor bot commented Apr 2, 2026

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk: this only relaxes CI policy checks and does not affect runtime code or production behavior.

Overview
Relaxes PR validation in .github/workflows/reusable-workflows.yml by removing the pr-branch-check-name and pr-branch-target-gitflow jobs.

The workflow now runs only the pr-title-check semantic title validation on pull_request events.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit b7329ed. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@rmi22186 rmi22186 merged commit c9abbe9 into main Apr 2, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants