Repository navigation
Feat(docs): add new project type locate objects - #15
Conversation
Let's also mention it in the appropriate page, @susilnem |
| | idx | integer | Sequential row index. | | ||
| | task_id | string | The ID of the task. For tile-based project types (e.g. Find Features) this is a composition of `TileZ-TileX-TileY`. | | ||
| | 0_count | integer | The number of users who marked this task as 0, e.g. "no building" for Find Features. | | ||
| | task_partition_index | integer | Index of the mini-tile partition within the task (Locate Objects only). Rows are aggregated per partition rather than per task for this project type; empty for other project types. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we using the term "min-tile"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, the term is referenced in the concept note shared by FAirswipe.
| | project_id | string | The project identifier. Usually a ULID for new projects; legacy Firebase-style for older migrated projects. | | ||
| | group_id | string | Public group identifier within the project (e.g. `g183`). | | ||
| | task_id | string | Public task identifier; for tile-based projects formatted as `TileZ-TileX-TileY`. | | ||
| | task_partition_index | integer | Index of the mini-tile partition within the task (Locate Objects only, since a task's result is a list of per-partition values). Empty for other project types. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we using the term "min-tile"
| https://mapswipe.slack.com/archives/C0HCW2CJJ/p1774445684627589 | ||
| https://mapswipe.slack.com/archives/C09L064N77G |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any reason we need to add these slack links to ignore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These links return 403 status. As these are from the mapswipe workspace..
Discussed this with thenav56.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"About the data" section should also change, because now the results have a different export format.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the export files, I’ve added the new field we introduced for this project type. If that’s what you were referring to.
3 participants
No description provided.