Add Pydantic support (PydanticClassDeclaration)#11243
Open
mauriciogardini wants to merge 11 commits into
Open
Conversation
…and docs Adds first-class Pydantic support helpers to the Python emitter framework, including convenience class declarations for BaseModel, BaseSettings, and RootModel, plus typed decorator builders for common validator/serializer patterns. Also expands tests and adds package-level documentation with practical usage examples. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Regenerate pnpm-lock.yaml after rebasing the pydantic-support branch onto upstream main so dependency resolution is consistent in CI. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Remove the temporary emitter-framework readme added during pydantic helper iteration to keep this PR focused on code and tests only. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
microsoft-github-policy-service
Bot
added
the
emitter-framework
mauriciogardini
requested review from
bterlson,
catalinaperalta,
iscai-msft,
markcowl,
timotheeguerin and
witemple-msft
as code owners
commit: |
Contributor
|
All changed packages have been documented.
Show changes
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This branch adds Pydantic-oriented Python emitter support in
@typespec/emitter-frameworkby aligning with the new APIs introduced in Alloy Python (PydanticClassDeclaration, richerpydantic/typing/pydantic_settingsexternals, and decorator ordering for class/static methods).What changed
python/components/class-declaration/PydanticClassDeclarationBaseModeldefault base)modelConfig(structuredConfigDict(...)generation)modelConfigExpression(verbatimmodel_config = ...expression)pydanticModule(including validators/serializers,ConfigDict,RootModel, subpaths)typingModule(additional annotation symbols)pydanticSettingsModule(BaseSettings,SettingsConfigDict)Methodnow acceptsdecorators?: Children[]@classmethod/@staticmethod) to support Pydantic validator stacking order.externals.pydantic-class-declaration.test.tsxmodel_config, validator ordering, and settings base usage.Validation
@typespec/emitter-frameworkbuild passes.