[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-69388: Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all applications unexpectedly by openshift-cherrypick-robot · Pull Request #15848 · openshift/console

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2025-12-16T07:25:31Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #15812

/assign vikram-raj

…lications unexpectedly

coderabbitai · 2025-12-16T07:25:39Z

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)

do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-16T07:25:43Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62713 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-69388: Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all applications unexpectedly

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #15812

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-16T07:25:53Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #15812

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

vikram-raj · 2025-12-16T15:43:47Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-16T15:43:52Z

@vikram-raj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

vikram-raj · 2025-12-16T15:43:57Z

/retest

vikram-raj · 2025-12-16T15:44:53Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-16T15:45:02Z

@vikram-raj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62713 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62713 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

vikram-raj · 2025-12-17T14:38:29Z

/retest

XiyunZhao · 2025-12-22T09:08:59Z

/verified by @XiyunZhao
Verified that the application filter in the Topology view no longer resets unexpectedly on Dev perspective and now behaves as expected

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-22T09:09:11Z

@XiyunZhao: This PR has been marked as verified by @XiyunZhao.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @XiyunZhao
Verified that the application filter in the Topology view no longer resets unexpectedly and now behaves as expected

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

vikram-raj

/lgtm

/approve

vikram-raj · 2025-12-22T09:23:24Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2025-12-22T09:23:37Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, vikram-raj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/OWNERS~~ [vikram-raj]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

vikram-raj · 2025-12-22T10:10:12Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-22T10:38:59Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d99c57d and 2 for PR HEAD a23f917 in total

vikram-raj · 2025-12-23T08:31:08Z

/retest

vikram-raj · 2025-12-30T08:57:34Z

/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-01-07T16:32:58Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0d6ef02 and 1 for PR HEAD a23f917 in total

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-01-08T20:32:34Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD dbba4c3 and 0 for PR HEAD a23f917 in total

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-01-08T21:25:52Z

/hold

Revision a23f917 was retested 3 times: holding

vikram-raj · 2026-01-12T13:43:26Z

/unhold
/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-01-13T04:00:02Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-69388 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #15812

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-merge-robot · 2026-01-17T10:16:55Z

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2026-01-17-030111

Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all app…

a23f917

…lications unexpectedly

openshift-cherrypick-robot assigned vikram-raj Dec 16, 2025

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2025

OCPBUGS-62713: Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all applications unexpectedly #15812

Merged

openshift-ci Bot changed the title ~~[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-62713: Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all applications unexpectedly~~ [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-69388: Prevent application filter in Topology view from resetting to all applications unexpectedly Dec 16, 2025

openshift-ci Bot requested review from TheRealJon and rhamilto December 16, 2025 07:25

openshift-ci Bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Dec 16, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 16, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 16, 2025

openshift-ci Bot requested a review from yapei December 16, 2025 15:45

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 22, 2025

vikram-raj reviewed Dec 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 22, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 22, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Dec 22, 2025

openshift-ci Bot assigned sanketpathak, XiyunZhao, yanpzhan and yapei Dec 22, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 8, 2026

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 12, 2026

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 19a4095 into openshift:release-4.21 Jan 13, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review skipped

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 17, 2025

Uh oh!

XiyunZhao commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 23, 2025

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Dec 30, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 7, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 8, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikram-raj commented Jan 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 13, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Jan 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

XiyunZhao commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading