Skip to content

CNV-95197: Comment out File Restore Operator from topic map - #119729

Merged
Vaishali-gif-rh merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
Vaishali-gif-rh:CNV-95197-remove-from-main
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

Vaishali-gif-rh merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
Vaishali-gif-rh:CNV-95197-remove-from-main

Conversation

@Vaishali-gif-rh

@Vaishali-gif-rh Vaishali-gif-rh commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
main (backport to 5.0 will follow)

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CNV-95197

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Commented out File Restore Operator documentation from the topic map as the parent epic was retargeted from v5.0 to v5.1. The module and assembly files remain in place and can be uncommented when the feature is ready to be published.

Commenting out the File Restore Operator topic map entry as the parent epic was retargeted from v5.0 to v5.1. The files remain in place and can be uncommented when the feature is ready to be published.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Vaishali-gif-rh: This pull request references CNV-95197 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.1.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
main (backport to 5.0 will follow)

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CNV-95197

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Commented out File Restore Operator documentation from the topic map as the parent epic was retargeted from v5.0 to v5.1. The module and assembly files remain in place and can be uncommented when the feature is ready to be published.

  • Commented out topic map entry for File Restore Operator
  • Files retained: modules/virt-about-file-restore-operator.adoc and virt/backup_restore/virt-file-restore-operator.adoc

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 11, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Fri Sep 11 11:13:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://119729--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Vaishali-gif-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Vaishali-gif-rh
Vaishali-gif-rh merged commit 1ead022 into openshift:main Sep 11, 2026
2 checks passed
@Vaishali-gif-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Vaishali-gif-rh: new pull request created: #119730

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-5.0 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants