add -dynamic-destination flag#15
Open
Xfennec wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
WIP, Incoming UDP support |
Author
|
UDP support added! Waiting for a review ;) |
Contributor
|
I like this but I have to set aside some time to test the changes. External testers welcome. :) |
Author
|
Understood. FYI, we have this fork running since 2 month without any issue. |
yuki0308
added a commit
to yuki0308/go-mmproxy
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
path-network/go-mmproxy path-network#15
kzemek
pushed a commit
to kzemek/go-mmproxy-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
We've a setup where multiple services should be available in the destination host. This flag allow the client to select the desired port in the PROXY protocol header.
Of course, the client should be trusted for this to work without security issues (in our case, its our frontal TCP reverse-proxy).
Any comment is welcome, and thanks for this helpful little tool! ;)