Skip to content

Feat/implicit head response validation#238

Open
saisatishkarra wants to merge 3 commits intopb33f:mainfrom
saisatishkarra:feat/implicit-head-response-validation
Open

Feat/implicit head response validation#238
saisatishkarra wants to merge 3 commits intopb33f:mainfrom
saisatishkarra:feat/implicit-head-response-validation

Conversation

@saisatishkarra
Copy link

@saisatishkarra saisatishkarra commented Feb 13, 2026

Add HEAD response validation for explicit HEAD and implicit GET definition in OAS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.61%. Comparing base (846c366) to head (a3753a1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #238      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.60%   97.61%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines        5256     5279      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits         5130     5153      +23     
  Misses        126      126              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.61% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant