Skip to content

i18n(ja): restore lost code fences (batch 4, 35 files) - #23529

Open
yahonda wants to merge 3 commits into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:i18n-ja-lost-code-fences-sweep-batch4
Open

i18n(ja): restore lost code fences (batch 4, 35 files)#23529
yahonda wants to merge 3 commits into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:i18n-ja-lost-code-fences-sweep-batch4

Conversation

@yahonda

@yahonda yahonda commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Continues the lost-code-fences sweep (batch 4 of the remaining files after batches 1-3: #23505, #23506, #23511). A machine-translation pipeline used previously sometimes dropped the ``` fence markers around code/config/log examples when translating EN to JA, leaving the example content bare (sometimes with a leftover 4-space "indented code block" artifact). This is a purely structural fix — no visible text was reworded.

35 files, restored via 3 parallel sub-batches. Every file verified with 3 layers of checking: (1) total ``` count now matches EN exactly, (2) block count matches EN exactly, (3) every restored block's line-by-line content, after stripping any leading blockquote > markers, has indentation identical to EN wherever the stripped content matches EN's line.

Also fixed 2 small adjacent defects found while restoring fences in the same lines:

  • storage-engine/rocksdb-overview.md: a stray tilde standing in for a dropped particle (`rocksdb/max-background-jobs`~3または4を調整してください`rocksdb/max-background-jobs`を3または4に調整してください)
  • sync-diff-inspector/sync-diff-inspector-overview.md: a stray <!----> MDX marker artifact left over from the missing fence, removed to match EN's plain blank line

Re-scanned the corpus fresh before starting this batch (per lessons from prior batches that the candidate list can go stale) — confirmed no new regressions from the daily translation-sync bot; the previously-flagged inline-triple-backtick-escape false positives (dm/deploy-a-dm-cluster-using-tiup*.md, dm/handle-failed-ddl-statements.md, production-deployment-using-tiup.md) are still correctly excluded.

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.4 (TiDB 8.4 versions)
  • v8.3 (TiDB 8.3 versions)
  • v8.2 (TiDB 8.2 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)
  • v5.3 (TiDB 5.3 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

  • This PR is translated from:
  • Other reference link(s):

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

Also fixes a dropped particle typo in storage-engine/rocksdb-overview.md
(rocksdb/max-background-jobs ~3または4を調整 -> を3または4に調整) and removes
a stray <!----> MDX marker artifact in sync-diff-inspector-overview.md
left over from the missing fence.
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Aug 14, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e9531b67-37f2-4fca-89a0-6543ef0f817a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign qiancai for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 14, 2026
@yahonda
yahonda marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2026 06:38
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 14, 2026
@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants