Skip to content

Conversation

@Luna712
Copy link
Contributor

@Luna712 Luna712 commented Dec 22, 2025

It's more explicit that way.

This also adds missing MDL_API_KEY to archive build, which seems was missed.

Additionally, this also removes running build manually, it's unnecessary now (since #2261). In the future, we can also probably remove androidSourcesJar and sources.jar from releases, ever since the library split it really hasn't been useful as we don't even include library sources in it, so we don't actually need it (unless it is still needed for some usage I'm not clear on, which is very possible). But for now, we can leave it. I also plans to have makeJar auto run with the release build type to auto include for all releases, including stable so we can have classes.jar for stable releases as well (though it would still need included in release artifacts still). We can also create a new workflow triggered by workflow_dispatch for manually triggering to streamline creating stable releases and auto include this as well. Those are just some things I'm planning for the future (if even wanted), but this is just a start for that.

It's more explicit that way.

This also adds missing `MDL_API_KEY` to archive build, which seems was missed.

Additionally, this also removes running `build` manually, it's unnecessary now. In the future, we can also probably remove `androidSourcesJar` and `sources.jar` from releases, every since the library split it really hasnt been useful as we don't even include library sources in it, so we don't actually need it. But for now, we can leave it. I also plans to have `makeJar` auto run with the release build type to auto include for all releases, including stable so we can have `classes.jar` for stable releases as well (though it would still need included in release artifacts still). We can also create a new workflow triggered by `workflow_dispatch` for manually triggering to streamline creating stable releases and auto include this as well. Those are just some things I'm planning for the future (if even wanted), but this is just a start for that.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant