You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Superfactorials now have been requested multiple times. They are defined:
$$n\$ = \prod_{i=1}^n i! = G(n+2)$$
A simple notation, that is common enough to warrant its own command. The G here is an analytical continuation, so unlike multitermials and subfactorials (both of which I cannot find one for) it can relatively easily support decimals. One consideration to take is efficiency, we will need to approximate way earlier.
Also, there will most definitely be no analytical continuation anywhere. Even an approximation I would have to figure out myself, so it would be limited to only smaller integers.
Also, there will most definitely be no analytical continuation anywhere. Even an approximation I would have to figure out myself, so it would be limited to only smaller integers.
Yeah I also don't expect too much information on that matter (or rather completely no information).
Gonna write down the derivation digitally later, for now here are the formulas (except float, as I would use the Bernoulli part for them, and digits, as it makes more sense to go directly to tower):
For approx, I would for each of the exponents separate whole number from decimals and make the base (the a in a*10^b) with those decimals (10^decimals). Then multiply and adjust going along. Sorta:
exponents.into_iter().map(|x| {let b = x.clone().floor();(ten.pow(x-b),b)}).fold((1,0), |a,e| adjust((a.0*e.0,a.1+e.1)))
Activity
tolik518 commentedon Jun 30, 2025
I haven't found anything online after a quick google, but I can imagine multi-superfactorials might also be a topic - like with multi-termials.
Aras14HD commentedon Jun 30, 2025
It is a little more ambiguous what multisuperfactorial means:
Also, there will most definitely be no analytical continuation anywhere. Even an approximation I would have to figure out myself, so it would be limited to only smaller integers.
tolik518 commentedon Jun 30, 2025
You're right. While for me it would make sense it to be
it might mean something different for others.
Yeah I also don't expect too much information on that matter (or rather completely no information).
Edit: Oopps closed the ticket by accident
Aras14HD commentedon Feb 27, 2026
Gonna write down the derivation digitally later, for now here are the formulas (except float, as I would use the Bernoulli part for them, and digits, as it makes more sense to go directly to tower):
For approx, I would for each of the exponents separate whole number from decimals and make the base (the a in a*10^b) with those decimals (10^decimals). Then multiply and adjust going along. Sorta: