Deprecate FromArrowArray in favour of ArrowSession array imports

[robert3005]

Remove all usages of FromArrowArray and ToArrowArray in favour of using ArrowSession

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1934 untouched benchmarks
🆕 12 new benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	cold_misaligned[(64, 256)]	4.4 ms	5.1 ms	-14.19%
⚡	Simulation	decode_varbin[(1000, 4)]	99.3 µs	60.5 µs	+63.93%
⚡	Simulation	slice_primitive_tight_loop[10000]	502.7 µs	438.1 µs	+14.76%
⚡	Simulation	slice_dict_tight_loop[10000]	837.8 µs	738.5 µs	+13.45%
⚡	Simulation	decompress[u64, (1000, 16)]	72.5 µs	65 µs	+11.52%
⚡	Simulation	compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)]	1.2 ms	1 ms	+10.52%
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[random/n2/nonnull]	N/A	420.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[random/n2/null]	N/A	428.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[random/n64/nonnull]	N/A	650.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[random/n64/null]	N/A	715.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[round_robin/n2/nonnull]	N/A	355.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive_mixed_constants[round_robin/n2/null]	N/A	357.5 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[random/n2/nonnull]	N/A	537.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[random/n2/null]	N/A	545.9 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[random/n64/nonnull]	N/A	869.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[random/n64/null]	N/A	910.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[round_robin/n2/nonnull]	N/A	376.8 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	primitive[round_robin/n2/null]	N/A	384.2 µs	N/A

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing rk/deprecate-arrow-arrays (6e1dc3e) with develop (e77f520)²}

Footnotes

1. 89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on develop (9157d6c) during the generation of this report, so e77f520 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩