Skip to content

Conversation

@sbc100
Copy link
Member

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Dec 15, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know how much overlap this has with flake8?

@sbc100
Copy link
Member Author

sbc100 commented Dec 15, 2025

Do you know how much overlap this has with flake8?

There is a great deal overlap, and ruff and pretty much replace flake8. There are couple of exception, for example some ruff checks that flake includes are still marked as experimental. See https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/b3836dc134fac64639df26f720c42593fe590d47/.circleci/config.yml#L548-L549

So for now it seems simpler just to run both. They are very cheap compared to everything else we do in CI.

@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the ruff_check branch 4 times, most recently from 065627a to 41b88d8 Compare December 16, 2025 00:05
@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the ruff_check branch 3 times, most recently from 23987ee to 378d964 Compare December 17, 2025 21:52
@sbc100
Copy link
Member Author

sbc100 commented Dec 17, 2025

@kripken could you cast an eye over fuzz_opt.py? Its one of the files with the more complex changes to it.

@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the ruff_check branch 2 times, most recently from 24be319 to 853f163 Compare December 17, 2025 23:08
@sbc100 sbc100 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 17, 2025 23:08
@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit bc55110 into main Dec 18, 2025
18 checks passed
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the ruff_check branch December 18, 2025 00:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants