Fix AGL velocity estimation using squared acceleration weight factor#11255
Merged
sensei-hacker merged 2 commits intoiNavFlight:maintenance-9.xfrom Feb 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
The AGL velocity update was incorrectly using squared acceleration weight factor (sq(accWeightFactor)) while the altitude update uses linear weight. This creates physical inconsistency where position and velocity respond differently to the same acceleration. With accWeightFactor=0.5 (moderate confidence): - Altitude receives 50% of acceleration (correct) - Velocity was receiving 25% of acceleration (wrong - squared) This fix removes sq() from the velocity update to match the altitude update, making both integrations physically consistent with standard kinematic equations. May fix iNavFlight#10314 May be related to iNavFlight#10567
Contributor
PR Compliance Guide 🔍All compliance sections have been disabled in the configurations. |
Comments incorrectly stated 0.3 when code uses 0.5f. Updated comments to match actual implementation.
|
Tested with Matek PMW3901. And I didn't find the results conclusive. Maybe because this sensor has such limited range under intense UV from the sun. I think it requires testing with a better lidar sensor like the MTF-01, which I don't have. To properly confirm the fix works. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
Summary
Fixes mathematical inconsistency in AGL velocity estimation where velocity update uses squared acceleration weight factor while altitude update uses linear weight factor.
Problem
In
navigation_pos_estimator_agl.cline 152, the velocity update incorrectly usessq(accWeightFactor)while line 151 (altitude update) correctly uses linearaccWeightFactor. This creates physical inconsistency where position and velocity respond differently to the same acceleration measurement.Impact with accWeightFactor=0.3
Changes
sq()wrapper fromaccWeightFactorin AGL velocity update (line 152)Testing
Code Review
Reviewed with inav-code-review agent - APPROVED. The fix correctly addresses a mathematical inconsistency and makes the kinematic integration physically consistent.
Related Issues
May fix #10314
May be related to #10567
PR Type
Bug fix
Description
Removes squared acceleration weight factor from AGL velocity update
Makes velocity integration consistent with altitude integration
Fixes velocity error during degraded accelerometer conditions
Both altitude and velocity now use linear weight factor scaling
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
navigation_pos_estimator_agl.c
Remove squared weight factor from velocity updatesrc/main/navigation/navigation_pos_estimator_agl.c
sq()wrapper fromaccWeightFactorin AGL velocity update atline 152
squared
weight factor
integration