GDB pretty-printers#8556
2 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1579 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
310 ns | 368.3 ns | -15.84% |
| ❌ | Simulation | encode_varbin[(1000, 8)] |
141.1 µs | 156.8 µs | -10.04% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
27 µs | 16.2 µs | +66.33% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
244.4 ns | 215.3 ns | +13.55% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
304.7 ns | 275.6 ns | +10.58% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | eq_i64_constant |
319 µs | 289.2 µs | +10.31% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing myrrc/gdb-pretty-printers (022fc8f) with develop (1118a20)
Footnotes
-
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩